Terry Ezell v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
Tallman, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TERRY LAMELL EZELL, No. 14-71696 Petitioner,
v.
OPINION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
Application to File Second or Successive Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Submitted December 11, 2014* Seattle, Washington
Filed January 23, 2015
Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Richard C. Tallman, and John B. Owens, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Tallman
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). SUMMARY**
Habeas Corpus
The panel denied a motion for certification to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to set aside a sentence imposed under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
The panel held that when a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) to file a second or successive petition presents a complex issue, this court may exceed the thirty-day time limit set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(D) for granting or denying the authorization.
The panel held that the Supreme Court did not announce a new rule of constitutional law in Descamps v. United States, 133 S. Ct.…