The United States of America, for the Use of Getz Bros. & Co. v. Markowitz Bros. (Delaware), Inc., and Continental Casualty Company, Inc., the United States of America, for the Use of Atkins, Kroll & Co., Ltd., and Atkins, Kroll (Guam), Ltd. v. Markowitz Bros. (Delaware), Inc., and Continental Casualty Company, Inc.

Good Law
383 F.2d 595·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5067
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 196721123California2,780 words

Opinion

Opinion

383 F.2d 595 The UNITED STATES of America, for the Use of GETZ BROS. & CO., Appellant, v. MARKOWITZ BROS. (DELAWARE), INC., and Continental Casualty Company, Inc., Appellees. The UNITED STATES of America, for the Use of ATKINS, KROLL & CO., Ltd., and Atkins, Kroll (Guam), Ltd., Appellant, v. MARKOWITZ BROS. (DELAWARE), INC., and Continental Casualty Company, Inc., Appellees. No. 21122. No. 21123. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. September 21, 1967. W. Scott Barrett, Barrett, Ferenz & Trapp, Agana, Guam, and Oakland, Cal., for appellants. Reyes & Lamorena, Agana, Guam, for appellee Markowitz Bros., Inc. Smith, Currie & Hancock, Edward H. Wasson, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee Continental Cas. Co. Before JOHNSEN, * BARNES, and ELY, Circuit Judges. ELY, Circuit Judge: 1 These consolidated appeals come from judgments in two suits instituted under provisions of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a-270d. The appellants were the use plaintiffs below. The appellees are a defaulting contractor and its corporate surety. The use plaintiff in No. 21,122, Getz Bros. & Co., will be called Getz, while those in No. 21,123, Atkins, Kroll & Co.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.