People v. Pierce CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 26, 2015A138870California3,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/26/15 P. v. Pierce CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, A138870

v. (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. SC076789A)

RANDALL BLAINE PIERCE,

Defendant and Appellant. _______________________________________/

At his initial arraignment, appellant Randall Blaine Pierce requested permission to represent himself. (Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 (Faretta).) He completed and signed a form entitled “Waiver of Right to Counsel and Order Permitting Appearance in Propria Persona” advising him of the risks of self-representation. After confirming Pierce understood the consequences of self-representation listed on the form, the court allowed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.