Usdc-Nvl
Sussex v. United States District Court
Opinion
Opinion
Ikuta, J.
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 27, 2015, and published at 776 F.3d 1092 , is hereby amended as follows:
On page 1099, the first sentence of the final paragraph should be deleted and replaced with the following:
On page 1100, the following should be added to the end of the paragraph continued from page 1099:
On page 1102, in the penultimate paragraph, the phrase “Aerojet-General’s dicta” should be replaced with “Aerojet-Gen-eral ”.
With these amendments, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Fernandez and Judge Al-britton so recommended. The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no judge requested a vote for en banc consideration.
The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc will be entertained.
OPINION
Sussex and other petitioners (collectively, “Sussex”) seek a writ of mandamus directing a district court to vacate its grant of a motion, while arbitration was pending, to disqualify an arbitrator for evident partiality under 9 U.S.C. § 10…