Marriage of Rush CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 2015B253478California736 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 1/27/15 Marriage of Rush CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

In re Marriage of RAMAUL and 2d Civil No. B253478 CYNTHIA D. RUSH. (Super. Ct. No. D346247) (Ventura County)

RAMAUL RUSH,

Appellant,

v.

CYNTHIA D. RUSH,

Respondent.

Ramaul Rush (husband) appeals from a November 4, 2013 post-judgment order awarding Cynthia D. Rush (wife) spousal support. (Fam. Code § 4330.)1 Husband claims that the trial abused its discretion in awarding support after the marriage was dissolved in 2012. We affirm. On September 13, 2012, husband obtained a default judgment of dissolution, dissolving his 30 plus year marriage with wife. Although the judgment made no provision for spousal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.