Schultz

Filed 1/29/15 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

CRAIG SCHULTZ, B255678

Petitioner, (W.C.A.B. No. ADJ582920)

v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

WORKERS' COMPENSATION [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] APPEALS BOARD and JOINT TEST TACTICS AND TRAINING (JT3) et al.,

Respondents.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 6, 2015, be modified in the following particulars: On page 10, the first full sentence of the first paragraph reads: “There is no dispute in this case about the facts that pertain to the premises line rule.” The sentence should be replaced with: “There is no dispute in this case about the facts that are material to the premises line rule.” On page 14, the following paragraph should be inserted as the last paragraph of the “Analysis” section: Finally, we reject JT3’s contention (citing Lantz v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 298, 314) that the California Supreme Court decision in Santa Rosa Junior College v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals…