Woody's Group, Inc. v. City of Newport Beach

Good Law
183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 318·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 83·233 Cal. App. 4th 1012
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2015G050155California8,406 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bedsworth, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

The language of the law is replete with synonyms for fairness: due process, equal protection, good faith, and harmless error are all ways of expressing our commitment to fairness. The City Council of Newport Beach violated at least two basic principles of fairness in overturning a permit application approved by the city’s planning commission. It should come as no surprise, then, that their action also violated California law.

First basic principle: You cannot be a judge in your own case. In this case Councilmember Mike Henn, having already voiced his “strongO” opposition to Woody’s Group, Inc.’s application, was allowed to appeal the approval of Woody’s application to the very body on which he sits, where he did his best to convince his colleagues to vote with him against the application.

Second basic principle: You cannot change the rules in the middle of the game. The Newport Beach Municipal Code requires appeals from the city’s planning commission to the city council be brought by “interested parties],” who pay a filing fee and submit their appeal on a form provided by the city. (Newport Beach Mun. Code, § 20.64.030.) The Newport Beach Municipal Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.