United States v. Luis Ensaldo-Flores

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 201514-10074California247 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 14-10074 14-10075 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:12-cr-00355-RCC v. 4:13-cr-01178-RCC

LUIS ENSALDO-FLORES, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015**

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Luis Ensaldo-Flores appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of

U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive four-

month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.