Jose Padilla-Razo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
591 F. App'x 602
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 29, 201513-72003California250 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jose Luis Padilla-Razo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order of removal. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Padilla-Razo has not challenged the agency’s dispositive determination that he is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (a)(2)(B)(i) based on his conviction for an offense relating to a controlled substance, or the agency’s determination that he is not eligible for relief from removal. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083 , 1091 n. 3 (9th Cir.2011) (issues not raised in opening brief are waived).

Padilla-Razo’s challenge to the agency’s denial of his request for release from immigration custody on the condition of bond is not properly before us. See 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (e); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19 (d); Leonardo v. Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1160 (9th Cir.2011) (clarifying the proper procedure for challenging a Casas-Castñllon bond determination).

This dismissal is without prejudice to petitioner’s seeking prosecutorial discre tion or deferred action from the Department of Homeland Security. See Reno v. American-Arab…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.