Mir

Mir v. Iugerich & Spackman CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 2015B250393California3,745 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/29/15 Mir v. Iugerich & Spackman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JEHAN JEB MIR, B250393

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC212361) v.

IUNGERICH & SPACKMAN,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Elizabeth Allen White, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Law Offices of Joseph R. Zamora and Joseph R. Zamora for Plaintiff and

Appellant.

Iungerich & Spackman and Russell Iungerich for Defendant and Respondent.

_______________________________________ Iungerich & Spackman, a Professional Law Corporation (Iungerich), obtained a money judgment against Jehan Zeb Mir (Mir) in 2003.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.