People v. Ortiz CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2015B256479California926 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 1/30/15 P. v. Ortiz CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B256479

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SA084327) v.

JAIME MIGUEL ORTIZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:*

Defendant and appellant Jaime Miguel Ortiz (defendant) appeals his conviction relating to his attack of a transit employee. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), raising no issues. On November 14, 2014, we notified defendant of his counsel’s brief and gave him leave to file, within 30 days, his own brief or letter stating any grounds or argument he might wish to have considered. That time has elapsed, and defendant has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.