Guanqun Zhang v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
592 F. App'x 573
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 201513-70146California311 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Yu Zhu Chu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir.2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination based on the inconsistencies relating to how Chu got a passport and his address. See id. at 1048 (adverse credibility determination was reasonable under the “totality of circumstances”). Chu’s explanations do not compel a contrary result. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000). In light of our conclusions, we do not reach Chu’s contention regarding corroborative evidence. In the absence of credible testimony, Chu’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.