G. Ricardo Salas v. United States

Good Law
384 F.2d 922·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4798
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 196721401California300 words

Opinion

Opinion

The appellant is a citizen and taxpayer of the Territory of Guam. 48 U.S.C. § 1421d(c) provides, in effect, that specified transportation and housing expenses of certain officers and employees of the Territory shall be borne by the United States. Since fiscal 1953, failure of Congress to appropriate funds for the expense has necessitated its payment by the Territory. Appellant’s suit against the United States was presented as a class action. He alleged that the Government of Guam has failed to institute legal action to recover the amount, over $10,000,000, and that it would be useless for him to request that it do so. His particular interest in thé claimed obligation, like the interest of his fellow Guamanian taxpayers for whom he purported to act, is not measurable. District Court jurisdiction was invoked under provisions of the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (a) (2), and the Organic Act of Guam, 48 U.S.C. § 1424 (a).

The Tucker Act limits the jurisdiction of the District Court to “[a]ny other civil action or claim against the United States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount * * * ” 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (a) (2). While approximately one-half of the claimed amount would appear to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.