Wakefield
Wakefield v. Carone CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The Wakefields are husband and wife, and owners of a property located in
Murrieta, California. In 2010, to fund building a house on the property, the Wakefields
took out two construction loans. The first construction loan, in the amount of
$2,200,000, was from the D&E Five Trust, of which the Wakefields are the beneficiaries.
The second construction loan, in the amount of $375,000, was from defendants. Both
construction loans were secured by promissory notes and deeds of trust with the power to
sell. And both the construction loans were subordinate to a first loan, in the amount of
$670,000, which the Wakefields took out in purchasing the property (purchase loan).
In 2011, an additional $355,000 was added to the principal of the construction
loan from defendants, for the purpose of completing construction, as well as paying
property taxes and insurance. In exchange, the promissory note securing the loan from
defendants, now with a total principal balance of $730,000, was made superior to the
promissory note securing the D&E Five Trust loan. The loan from defendants was not
made superior to the purchase loan.