People v. Hood CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 2015D065076California2,703 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

Filed 2/4/15 P. v. Hood CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D065076

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCN303291)

DANIEL ROGER HOOD,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Blaine K.

Bowman, Judge. Affirmed.

Siri Shetty, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General,

Martin E. Doyle, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. A jury convicted Daniel Roger Hood of five counts of oral copulation on a child

10 years of age or younger (Pen. Code, § 288.7, subd. (b));1 one count of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.