National Union Fire Insurance v. Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance

Good Law
183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 472·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 103·233 Cal. App. 4th 1348
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 2015B244899California5,989 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodman, J.

Plaintiff and appellant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (National Union), as excess insurer of Costco Wholesale Corporation (Costco), filed this lawsuit against Yokohama Tire Corporation (Yokohama) and its primary and excess insurers Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (U.S. Branch), and Tokio Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., respectively (together, Tokio Marine) to recover sums it expended in settlement of a personal injury claim allegedly resulting from, among other things, material and design defects present in a tire manufactured by Yokohama and sold by Costco to Jack Daer, the plaintiff in the underlying case. Costco and Yokohama individually settled with Daer on the first day of trial, Costco for $5.5 million and Yokohama for $1.1 million.

In this lawsuit, National Union sought to recover the $4,312,681.96 it paid on behalf of Costco to settle that lawsuit. National Union, as subrogee of Costco, sought recovery against Yokohama based on an express indemnity provision in the supplier agreement between the two companies, as well as an alleged breach of Yokohama’s contractual insurance obligations. In addition, it sued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.