Vaca

Vaca v. Lewenfus CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 2015B249885California4,091 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/5/15 Vaca v. Lewenfus CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

ANA VACA et al., B249885

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC479045) v.

SHELDON LEWENFUS,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment (order) of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Debre K. Weintraub, Judge. Reversed. Law Office of Nick A. Alden, Nick A. Alden and Aleksey Sirotin for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Neufeld Marks, Timothy L. Neufeld and Yuriko M. Shikai for Defendant and Respondent. _______________________________

Appellant Ana Vaca sued her former attorney, Neil M. Howard, and his alleged agent, employee, and co-conspirator, respondent Sheldon Lewenfus, for damages…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.