Francis Jacob Young v. United States
385 F.2d 417·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 16, 196721287_1California37 words
Opinion
We have examined the record in the light of the specifications of error and briefs and oral arguments of counsel, and are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction, and no prejudicial error occurred.
Affirmed.