Elder

Elder v. Blakes CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2015B250845California3,623 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant David T. Blakes, Jr. (Blakes) appeals from a July 16, 2013 judgment awarding plaintiff and respondent Isaac Elder $55,100. Following a two-day bench trial, the trial court found Blakes personally liable on Elder’s claims for breach of a promissory note, breach of an oral guaranty, and money lent. Blakes makes the following contentions on appeal: (1) Elder failed to name 4709 and 5019 August St., LLC (the LLC) as a defendant, which was the named debtor in the underlying promissory note; (2) Elder’s action is barred by the one-action rule (Code Civ. Proc., § 726) because the underlying promissory note was secured by an interest in real property; (3) Elder cannot recover against Blakes on his claims for breach of a promissory note and money lent because the underlying promissory note expressly obligates the LLC, and not Blakes, to repay Elder’s outstanding debt; and (4) Elder’s claim for breach of an oral guaranty is barred by the statute of frauds (Civ. Code, § 1624, subd. (a)). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY1

1. The Investment Agreement, the Promissory Note, and Blakes’s Promise to Pay Around 2008,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.