Weinstock

Weinstock v. Rosenberg CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 2015B251512California3,908 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/9/15 Weinstock v. Rosenberg CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

DENISE WEINSTOCK, as Trustee, etc., B251512

Plaintiff and Respondent. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BP108632) v.

JOEL ROSENBERG et al.,

Defendants,

ROBERT S. FINK,

Objector and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. David J. Cowan, Judge. Affirmed.

Robert S. Fink, in pro. per., for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

___________________________________ Attorney Robert Fink appeals from a trial court order assessing sanctions against him in connection with his clients’ unsuccessful opposition to a motion for a protective order. The trial court concluded the discovery at issue was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.