Aeronca Manufacturing Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Good Law
385 F.2d 724·66 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2574·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4666
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 1, 196721305_1California2,119 words

Opinion

Opinion

385 F.2d 724 AERONCA MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW-AFL-CIO, Intervenor. No. 21305. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Nov. 1, 1967. Sweeney, Cozy & Foye, Mathias J. Diederich (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Solomon I. Hirsh, Atty. (argued), N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. 1 Arnold, Smith & Schwartz, Laurence D. Steinsapir, Los Angeles, Cal., for the intervenor, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW-AFL-CIO. 2 Before BARNES and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and HAUK, * District judge. HAUK, District Judge: 3 This proceeding involves a petition of the Aeronca Manufacturing Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring the Company to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, to reinstate a discharged employee, Robert Hanke, with back pay, and to post appropriate notices. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.