Mir

Mir v. Iungerich & Spackman CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 10, 2015B250393MCalifornia3,965 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/10/15 Mir v. Iungerich & Spackman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JEHAN ZEB MIR, B250393

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC212361) v.

IUNGERICH & SPACKMAN, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendant and Respondent. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

The petition for modification or, in the alternative, rehearing is denied. First, we did not remand the matter. Second, as noted in the opinion, the issue of the correct spelling of the judgment debtor’s middle name was not before us. However, given that prior to May 31, 2013 the clerk of the trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.