People v. Acedo CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and

proceedings in the trial court. Counsel has presented no argument for reversal, and

invited this court to review the record for error in accordance with Wende, supra,

3 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 738, counsel identified the following

as possible, but not arguable, issues:

"1. Whether appellant's guilty plea was unlawful, and should be vacated,

because appellant entered into a plea bargain in violation of Penal Code section 1192.7,

subdivision (a)(2), which limits pleas bargaining in cases alleging the commission of a

serious felony?

"2. Whether the trial court erred by denying appellant's motion to withdraw his

guilty plea?"

A review of the record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders,

supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the issues suggested by counsel, has disclosed no

reasonably arguable appellate issue. We granted Acedo permission to file a brief on his

own behalf. He has not responded. Acedo has been represented by competent counsel

on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

MCDONALD, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

O'ROURKE, J.

4