In re I.R. CA2/1

BACKGROUND

The section 300, subdivisions (b) and (g) petition DCFS filed a section 300 petition on behalf of I.R. on January 8, 2014, and a first amended petition on January 31, 2014. In a jurisdictional hearing that commenced on May 8, 2014, and concluded on May 12, 2014, the juvenile court sustained paragraph b-1 of the section 300 petition, which alleged that in January 2014 Mother was incarcerated and had failed to make an appropriate plan for I.R.’s care. Paragraph b-2 as sustained alleged Father repeatedly fell asleep at a hospital while I.R. was under his care and

Undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code. 2 Indeed, Father and DCFS have “stipulated” to such a “limited reversal.” Father and DCFS assert that our review is not necessary in light of that stipulation. We respect the courtesy, but conclude that the parties have not made the requisite showing under Code of Civil Procedure section 128, subdivision (a)(8) that would allow us to reverse an order of the juvenile court without our independent review. 3 We dismissed Robbie B.’s (Mother) appeal as abandoned on January 26, 2015. (See In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 838; In re…