County of Los Angeles v. Ifroze CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 2015B249559California2,818 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/13/15 County of Los Angeles v. Ifroze CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, B249559

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BY840215) v.

MOHAMMED IFROZE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Nancy Svetich Pogue, Commissioner. Affirmed.

Mohammed Ifroze, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Alexandra Bauer and Richard H. Kim, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

________________________________________ Mohammed Ifroze appeals from a judgment of parentage declaring him to be the father of Niylah Ifroze.1 On appeal, Ifroze contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.