People v. Page CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 2015A142782California169 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Appellant’s no contest plea restricts the scope of the appeal before us. Because appellant did not request a certificate of probable cause, her appeal is limited to “postplea claims, including sentencing issues, that do not challenge the validity of the plea.” (People v. Cuevas (2008) 44 Cal.4th 374, 379; People v. Brown (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 356, 359-360.) We have independently reviewed the record and have found no arguable appellate issues. Under People v. Correa (2012) 54 Cal.4th 331, 340-341, it was proper for the trial court to impose consecutive sentences for the two section 1320.5 counts based on a single act of failing to appear. Appellate counsel advised appellant of her right to file a supplemental brief to bring to this court’s attention any issue she believes deserves review. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106.) Appellant did not file a supplemental brief. There are no legal issues that require further briefing.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

3 SIMONS, Acting P.J.

We concur.

JONES, J.

NEEDHAM, J.

4