Jose Camino v. L.S. McEwen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 201513-56319California355 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 18 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

JOSE J. CAMINO, No. 13-56319

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 8:12-cv-00057-GW-E

v.

MEMORANDUM*

L. S. MCEWEN, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 8, 2015 Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, WARDLAW, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Camino appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254

petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. The

California Court of Appeal’s determination that Camino was not subjected to an

unlawful, deliberate two-step interrogation is neither contrary to, nor an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. unreasonable application of, clearly established Supreme Court precedent.

U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.