Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. National Fire & Marine Insurance

Good Law
592 F. App'x 630
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 201512-17383California445 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

National Fire & Marine Insurance Company (National Fire)' appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Insurance Company). National Fire also appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for a continuance pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and its motion for reconsideration.

1. The district court did not err in granting partial summary judgment in favor of Insurance Company because National Fire failed to raise “genuine issues of material fact” regarding the triggering of excess coverage. As the district court noted, National Fire submitted no evidence to refute the expert reports submitted in support of the motion for partial summary judgment. Nat’l Ass’n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. Berch, 773 F.3d 1037, 1044 (9th Cir.2014). The district court’s ruling was neither premature nor advisory because it did not rule on National Fire’s actual indemnity obligation.

2. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying National Fire’s motion under Rule 56. National Fire’s failure to conduct discovery established its lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.