Lujan

Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. Lujan

Good Law
184 Cal. Rptr. 3d 225·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 152·234 Cal. App. 4th 608
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 2015A139863California6,461 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

This is the third in a series of appeals filed by appellant David J. Lujan in this case, the general background of which was described in our introduction in the earlier opinion: “A prominent Guam attorney [(Lujan)] was sued in two lawsuits in Hawaii, followed by a third lawsuit in California, the last of which, were it to succeed, could have cost the attorney millions of dollars, loss of his reputation, and perhaps his license to practice law. The attorney hired a law firm with offices in San Francisco and Guam to represent him, a representation that quickly came to include the filing of two more proceedings. The representation was vigorous indeed, and quickly generated significant billings about which the attorney came to complain, ultimately refusing to pay a large balance. The firm withdrew from the representation, and sued. Following a lengthy jury trial, the jury returned a verdict for the firm of $945,947.90, the full amount sought. The trial court later awarded $331,545.51 in prejudgment interest.” Lujan appealed, and we affirmed both the judgment and the award of prejudgment interest. (Calva Clark & Jacob LLP v. Lujan (July 28, 2014, A138210) [nonpub.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.