Iskanian

Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 2015B235158ACalifornia1,390 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/19/15 Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles CA2/2 Opinion following remand from Supreme Court

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ARSHAVIR ISKANIAN, B235158

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC356521) v.

CLS TRANSPORTATION

LOS ANGELES, LLC,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Robert Hess, Judge. Reversed in part and remanded with directions.

Capstone Law, Glenn Danas; Initiative Legal Group, Raul Perez for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Fox Rothschild, David F. Faustman, Yesenia M. Gallegos, Namal Tantula for Defendant and Respondent.

___________________________________________________ In August 2011,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.