Jimenez
Jimenez v. Cal. Hwy. Patrol CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Aaron, J.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Gabriel Jimenez (Gabriel), a minor, was struck by a motor vehicle and severely
injured as he was standing on the side of the highway behind a disabled vehicle in which
he had been travelling. Moments before the accident, California Highway Patrol Officer
J. V. Shelter made contact with Gabriel and told Gabriel that he was going to check on
another vehicle that was parked on the shoulder approximately 15 feet in front of
Gabriel's vehicle, and that he would be right back.
Gabriel, his mother Maria, and sister Lilia (collectively appellants), sued Officer
Shelter and the California Highway Patrol (respondents). In their first amended
complaint, each appellant alleged a separate cause of action for negligence against
respondents.1 Respondents moved for summary judgment on the ground that Officer
Shelter did not owe appellants a legal duty of care. In the alternative, respondents sought
summary judgment on the ground that they were immune from liability pursuant to
Government Code sections 820.2, 820.25 and 815.2, subdivision (b).
Maria and Lilia's claims were styled as claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress.