Jerry D. Chaney v. The State Bar of California

Good Law
386 F.2d 962·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 4467
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 21, 196721402California2,731 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnsen, J.

A law school graduate, not elsewhere admitted to the practice, took the examination required for admission to the California bar and twice failed to pass. He was eligible to take the examination a third time but chose not to do so. Instead, he brought suit under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , against the State Bar of California, members of its Board of Governors, and members of its Committee of Bar Examiners, in injunction and damages, for not being certified to the Supreme Court of California for admission.

The District Court dismissed the action and we affirm. We do so on the grounds that the alleged wrong upon which the suit is predicated does not involve any issue of constitutional substance; that, even if it had, this would not enable a suit to be maintained in the situation under the Civil Rights Act; and that it does not otherwise provide basis for any federal claim on which the court could grant relief. It may be observed in this connection that opportuni ty was accorded appellant to make any amendment or supplement to his complaint that he thought possible, but he stated he had none.

The extent to which federal concern is entitled to exist as to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.