In re Aiden R. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2015C075014California7,783 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/23/15 In re Aiden R. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Plumas) ----

In re AIDEN R. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

PLUMAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL

SERVICES AND PUBLIC GUARDIAN,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C075014

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. JV1300024,

JV1300025)

M.R.,

Defendant and Appellant.

M.R. (mother) appeals following the juvenile court’s dispositional orders that removed minors Aidan R. and Jayden R. from her custody. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 395.)1 Mother contends (1) there is insufficient evidence to support jurisdiction and (2) the juvenile court erred by failing to order in-person visitation and delegating discretion for

Undesignated statutory references…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.