Bridges
Bridges v. Smith CA3
Opinion
Opinion
DISCUSSION
I. & II. The Trial Court Did Not Err in Denying a Mistrial to Defendant, But Did Err in Awarding Attorney Fees to Plaintiffs
Defendant contends the trial court (Judge Smith) erred in denying defendant’s mistrial motion, when the original trial judge (Judge Schwartz) reportedly “retired” prior to completing the case, thus becoming “unavailable” to consider and sign any proposed order after hearing or to consider the motion for attorney fees and costs subsequently filed by plaintiffs.
Judge Schwartz presided at a two-day bench trial in this matter in January 2013. At the trial’s conclusion, Judge Schwartz, in a minute order and orally on the record, granted plaintiffs a five-year restraining order under section 527.6, and costs (pursuant to a cost bill).
Judge Schwartz then retired before rendering the formal order in this matter. Pursuant to section 635, Judge Smith entered the formal restraining order and an order for costs (per a subsequent cost bill, which totaled $523) in line with Judge Schwartz’s minute order; Judge Smith also awarded plaintiffs, after hearing, $5,050 in attorney fees.