Cummins

Cummins v. Lollar CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 2015B251854California1,605 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 2/23/15 Cummins v. Lollar CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

MARY CUMMINS, B251854

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BS143169) v.

AMANDA LOLLAR,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Carol Boas Goodson, Judge. Affirmed. Mary Cummins, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker and Dean A. Rocco for Defendant and Respondent.

_________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Mary Cummins (Cummins), in propria persona, appeals an order denying her petition for injunction prohibiting harassment by defendant and respondent Amanda Lollar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.