United States v. Nabor Campillo-Vega

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 24, 201513-10641California226 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 24 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10641

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00478-JGZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NABOR CAMPILLO-VEGA, a.k.a. Eduardo Campillo-Vega, a.k.a. Juan Manuel Vega-Zuniga,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2015**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Nabor Campillo-Vega appeals from the revocation of supervised release and

24-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Campillo-Vega’s counsel has filed a brief stating

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.