People v. Lee CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2015H039678California3,779 words

Opinion

Opinion

Premo, J.

Filed 2/24/15 P. v. Lee CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H039678

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. C1231283)

v.

TARA NALANI LEE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Tara Nalani Lee was convicted by jury trial of two counts of forgery (Pen. Code, § 470, subd. (d)).1 On appeal, she argues the trial court erred when it failed to give the jury an instruction on the sufficiency of the circumstantial evidence presented at trial. She also argues the court erred in excluding the testimony of three defense witnesses. Lastly, she claims the court should have stayed one of her convictions under section 654. We conclude that although we agree with defendant that the trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.