Vaillancourt

Vaillancourt v. Panahpour CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 2015B254559California4,627 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manella, J.

Filed 2/24/15 Vaillancourt v. Panahpour CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

B254559

ANDRE VAILLANCOURT, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC100818) Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ALIREZA PANAHPOUR,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lisa Hart Cole, Judge. Affirmed as modified. Fink & Steinberg and S. Keven Steinberg for Defendant and Appellant. David J. Wilzig for Plaintiff and Respondent.

____________________________________ In the underlying action, the trial court ordered the entry of a default against appellant Alireza Panahpour, D.D.S. (Dr. Panahpour) as a sanction for discovery abuse, and issued a default judgment for $273,506 to respondent Andre Vaillancourt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.