Kraus

Discussion Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court's finding that the Myoporum constitutes a private nuisance. There is no change in judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Filed 2/315 (unmodified version) Appendix is not available electronically

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

ROBERT KRAUS, 2d Civil No. B256183

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CV110500)

v. (San Luis Obispo County)

CARL J. GRILLI,

Defendant and Appellant.

This appeal concerns a dispute between neighbors over the height of a hedge that separates their…