Mies

Mies v. Sephora U.S.A.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2015A139410California7,642 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 2/2/15; pub. order 2/26/15 (see end of opn.)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

EVA VIDAL MIES,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A139410

v. SEPHORA U.S.A., INC., (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CGC-12-518619) Defendant and Respondent.

Eva Mies seeks to bring a class action against her former employer, Sephora U.S.A., Inc. (Sephora), on behalf of employees who, like her, worked as Specialists in Sephora’s California retail stores. Mies claims Sephora misclassified Specialists as exempt from certain provisions of California labor law and, as a result, failed to pay overtime wages and failed to compensate them for missed meal periods. However, after crediting evidence that all Specialists do not engage in the same tasks to the same extent, the trial court denied class certification, concluding individualized issues, not common ones, would predominate the determination of liability. We conclude the trial court used proper legal criteria in assessing class certification and substantial evidence supports the trial court’s findings. We therefore also conclude the court did not abuse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.