United States v. Joshua Runion

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 201513-30324California237 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FEB 26 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-30324

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 6:12-cr-00007-CCL

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSHUA EMIL RUNION,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 17, 2015**

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Joshua Emil Runion appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his jury-trial conviction and 51-month sentence for counterfeiting

obligations or securities of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 471.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Runion’s counsel has filed

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.