Sanowicz

Sanowicz v. Bacal

Bad Law
184 Cal. Rptr. 3d 517·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 183·234 Cal. App. 4th 1027
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 2015B252962California6,832 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodman, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Hillel Sanowicz (Sanowicz) and defendant Ben Bacal (Bocal) are licensed real estate salespersons. Sanowicz alleges that he and Bacal agreed to share commissions earned by either of them on certain sales of real property, but that Bacal breached that agreement. Sanowicz sued both Bacal and Sotheby’s International Realty, Inc. (Sotheby’s), dismissing the latter shortly after filing suit. This appeal is from the judgment entered by the trial court sustaining without leave to amend Bacal’s general demurrer to Sanowicz’s first amended complaint. We hold that two licensed real estate agents may agree to share commissions earned under the circumstances we describe in this opinion. Thus, we reverse, determining that leave should be granted to amend on remand if Sanowicz can do so in a manner consistent with the legal principles discussed.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On September 13, 2012, Sanowicz, a licensed California real estate agent, filed his complaint against Sotheby’s, a licensed California real estate broker, and Bacal, a licensed California real estate agent, in which Sanowicz alleged causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.