United Farm Workers of America v. La Union Es Para Todoa Staff Union CA6
Opinion
Opinion
Grover, J.
Filed 2/27/15 United Farm Workers of America v. La Union Es Para Todoa Staff Union CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
UNITED FARM WORKERS OF H039997
AMERICA, (Monterey County Super. Ct. No. M123292) Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
LA UNION ES PARA TODOS STAFF
UNION et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
In this appeal we explore the axiom that “a lawyer owes no general duty of confidentiality to nonclients.” (DCH Health Services Corp. v. Waite (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 829, 832 (DCH).) Plaintiff United Farm Workers of America challenges the denial of its motion to disqualify the law firm L+G, LLP and its attorneys (collectively, L+G) from representing defendants La Union Es Para Todos Staff Union,…