People v. Martinez CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 2015D066480California3,453 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Jennifer Nicole Martinez and codefendant Richard Holguin were charged by an

information with two counts of attempted murder (Pen. Code,1 §§ 664 and 187, subd. (a);

counts 1 and 2) and three counts of assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (a)(2); counts 3,

4, and 5). The information alleged in counts 1 and 2 that Holguin personally used a

firearm (§ 12022, subd. (b)) and intentionally discharged a firearm (§ 12022.53, subd.

(c)). The information also alleged in count 2 that Holguin discharged a firearm, which

caused great bodily injury within the meaning of section 12022.53, subdivision (d). In

counts 3, 4, and 5, the information alleged that Holguin used a firearm within the

meaning of section 12022.5, subdivisions (a) and (d).

The trial court granted a defense motion for a separate jury and the case was tried

before two juries.2 Holguin's jury found Holguin guilty on the three assault counts, but

was unable to reach a verdict on the two attempted murder counts. Consequently, the

trial court declared a mistrial as to the attempted murder counts. Martinez's jury found

Martinez guilty on all counts. The court sentenced Martinez to eight years…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.