Guglielmo Pasquale v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
594 F. App'x 433
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 201511-73120California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Guglielmo Pasquale, a native and citizen of Italy, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (I.J.) denial of his application for cancellation of removal.. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Pasquale, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, was placed into removal proceedings in 2003. Despite an extensive criminal record, he was granted cancellation of removal in 2006. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appealed, and while its appeal was pending, Pasquale was convicted of additional crimes. The BIA granted DHS’s motion to remand the case to the I.J., who found Pasquale ineligible for cancellation of removal on the basis of one of the new convictions, which she concluded was an aggravated felony. The BIA disagreed, holding that the crime was not an aggravated felony, but remanded Pasquale’s case to the I.J. in 2010 to determine whether he remained entitled to cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion. The I.J. concluded that he did not and ordered him removed. The BIA affirmed.

Pasquale argues that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.