Andrew

Andrew v. v. Super. Ct.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 2015G051310MCalifornia2,429 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/3/15; unmodified opinion and pub. & mod. order dated 2/9/15 attached

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ANDREW V.,

Petitioner, G051310

v. (Super. Ct. No. 04D009068)

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; COUNTY, (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT)

Respondent,

JESSICA V.,

Real Party in Interest.

THE COURT: *

The per curiam opinion filed on January 23, 2015 and modified and certified for publication on February 9, 2015, is further modified as follows: 1. On page 3, second paragraph: Add the phrase “, while present at the hearing,” following the words “Father’s counsel.” As revised, the second sentence of the second paragraph on page 3 should read: “Respondent court recognized that Father’s counsel had a right to cross-examine the child custody investigator, and the court further

* Before Aronson, Acting P.J., Ikola, J., and Thompson, J.

acknowledged that Father’s counsel, while present at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.