People v. Quinones CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Louis John Quinones appeals from judgment entered following a jury
conviction for possessing heroin for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351). In a bifurcated
trial, the trial court also found true the enhancement allegations that defendant suffered a
prior conviction in 2004 (Health & Saf. Code, § 11370.2); a prior prison term (Pen. Code,
§ 667.5, subd. (b))1; and a prior serious or violent felony conviction (§§ 667, subd.
(e)(1)). The trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate term of seven years in state
prison.
Defendant contends his trial attorney committed ineffective assistance of counsel
(IAC) by (1) failing to object to expert opinion testimony on whether defendant
possessed heroin for sale; (2) stipulating to allowing the prosecution to search his two cell
phones and photograph text messages found on the phones; and (3) failing to object to the
prosecution introducing into evidence the California Law Enforcement
Telecommunication Systems (CLETS) report. In addition, defendant argues the trial
court committed prejudicial error by failing sua sponte to give the jury CALCRIM No.
225, and abused its discretion in denying defendant’s…