Haq

Haq v. Khatib CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2015B256194California3,463 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grimes, J.

Filed 3/4/15 Haq v. Khatib CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

MUNAZZA HAQ, as Trustee, etc., B256194

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VC062786) v.

ADNAN KHATIB,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John A. Torribio, Judge. Affirmed.

AlvaradoSmith, Marc D. Alexander, and William M. Hensley for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Borchard & Callahan, Thomas J. Borchard and Janelle M. Dease for Defendant and Respondent.

********** In this action to quiet title to real property, the trial court found in favor of defendant and respondent Adnan Khatib after a bench trial, concluding the lis pendens he recorded in April 1992 gave constructive notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.