People v. McCowan-Nance CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 2015C075853California434 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/4/15 P. v. McCowan-Nance CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C075853

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13F05417)

v.

CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER McCOWAN-NANCE,

Defendant and Appellant.

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Having reviewed the record as required by Wende, we affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 110, 124.)

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Over a two-month period in the summer of 2013, defendant Christopher Alexander McCowan-Nance sent hundreds of e-mails to the victim,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.