People v. Esparza CA3

Filed 3/4/15 P. v. Esparza CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE, C075007

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CM027560)

v.

ANTONIO RICHARD ESPARZA,

Defendant and Appellant.

This case comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Defendant Antonio Richard Esparza filed a supplemental brief arguing that the Butte County trial court erred in imposing consecutive state prison terms for his Sacramento County and Butte County convictions. We address this issue, in addition to undertaking a review of the record as required by Wende, and affirm the judgment. We provide the following brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case. (See…